ASAS: The Letterina No 270 - Thursday, February 24, 2011 Dear Honourable Ministers
Gelmini, Brunetta,
let me through "Letterina" this week, and
They socialize with the readers of the weekly independent schools association of Sicily, a
my reflection.
An old Latin proverb stated: "ab posse valet illative them to a posse to them
not valet illative" which loosely translated means of asserting that a "must" is
can translate into a "categorical imperative" is a logical consequence, but to say a
"may use" should be translated into a "categorical duty" is illogical un'illazione.
His Ministry, Hon Gelmini, at least this time, has transformed a chance in a categorical imperative, in violation of, among other things, his decrees, the Hon Minister Brunetta,
that gave the Administration the power to disregard certain agreements wicked.
I refer to the two circulars issued on 8 February 2011 which provide another theft at schools. The first, No 11 Prot.AOODGPER .751 Regarding the "Assignments of school leaders and teachers to perform the tasks associated with implementation of the autonomy scolastica”.
Legge 23/12/1998, n 448- art. 26, comma 8. Anno scolastico 2011/2012.
La seconda, la 12 Prot.AOODGPER. 752 che riguarda: “Collocamenti fuori ruolo e comandi dei dirigenti scolastici e del personale docente presso:
• enti e associazioni che svolgono attività di prevenzione del disagio psico-sociale, assistenza, cura, riabilitazione e reinserimento di tossicodipendenti;
• associazioni professionali ed enti cooperativi da esse promossi;
• università e altri istituti d’istruzione superiore”.
Legge 23 dicembre 1998, n. 448 - articolo 26, commi 8, 9 e 10.
Pensavo che non ci fossero più motivi (Provided that the above are real and urgent) to continue to dry the remaining water poor school, but his ministry On.Gelmini, remembering that by law the administration may claim for the tasks associated with implementation of the autonomy school, the work of five school administrators and / or teachers and two hundred (and if required even more!) for the support of unions and associations, has been translated the "posse" to "they" operating, what is envisaged as a possibility, has been translated into an urgent and indispensable duty, in a real imperative. And so 700 units of school staff, the year prossimo, lasceranno l’insegnamento e/o la direzione di un istituto.
Non sarò molto specializzato in sociologia o particolarmente esperto sui valori fondanti la democrazia diun Paese, ma penso di avere ancora un poco di “materia grigia” per tenere lontano da me l’idea di negare la necessità di rappresentatività dei lavoratori e dei diritti sindacali. Anzi, a scanso di ogni equivoco, affermo subito che, senza i sindacati, specialmente quando superano le ideologie e i corporativismi, non può essere pienamente garantita la democrazia di un Paese.
Se, comunque, si vuole utilizzare personale della scuola a servizio d’organizzazioni sindacali e professionali, vorrei, almeno, che non mi si neghi, con sterili polemiche, il diritto d’indignazione e la possibilità di affermare, con piena libertà, che continuare a retribuire quanti lavorano “fuori dagli istituti scolastici”, con i soldi dello Stato, è un furto legalizzato e che l’attuale linea ministeriale che prevede di conservare i comandi nonostante i pesanti tagli delle risorse umane, strutturali ed economiche, è in pratica un omicidio programmato giacché le scuole non riescono più a dare adempimento agli attuali carichi di lavoro.
Non è credibile l’Amministrazione scolastica, non lo sono i sindacati e le associazioni che difendono, spesso a chiacchiere, la scuola pubblica e poi si prestano al saccheggio quando c'è in gioco Corporate and private interest. A
limit, let me at least, a linear and constructive proposal: proceed immediately to stabilize the number and time controls for each association that so requests and the suspension of the emoluments of "controlled" that can be paid by the unions (read also: associations, political parties ...) banking cards of the members regularly.
Thinking, still, senior staff and faculty that will be controlled / used for tasks related to the implementation of school at central and local school administrations and the Ministry of Education Institutions and other institutions, "the question arises: but support for the implementation of school would not be too technical expertise of managers called in order to contribute to the goals of education and training assigned to schools and education, in addition to study, research and technical advice to the Minister and Director-General "?
If this is so because these commands / uses?
In reality, among other things, in which 2,800 executives in 10,000 are empty (and next year it will be 3,500), exempting hundreds of school leaders to be included in the USR, and let acephalous institutions does not seem neither logical nor beneficial . We must put the emphasis on flexibility and objective criteria to select the 500 controlled?
enough to think that a head teacher, despite being the first formal qualifications, was denied because the winner of the 2004 command and then irremovable from its premises, while the very same USR Palermo were controlled by two directors who have won the same competition.
was never verified, even by the way, the contribution of core support? Schools, after a decade of independence, are still "children" to be protected? Calculated the cost of advice from support groups? The law (of the last century), which addressed at that time problems of innovation, it is not today an anachronism?
that schools can not require the full implementation of autonomy.
I think it would be easy to stop with these commands, then release the mobility for executives winners of 2004 (given also the large number of vacant seats) and then the competition for external staff in the USR as required by common sense or use the retired staff with consulting contracts.
Circular No 11 provides that the personnel to perform support duties must possess the autonomy of soft skills like planning, management and promotion, must have, therefore, a professional motivation to be part of the process d’innovazione, la capacità di porsi in relazione, di lavorare in gruppo, di assumere responsabilità e un significativo spessore culturale in ordine ai processi didattici, organizzativi e relazionali derivanti dall’autonomia.
Se i dirigenti tecnici non possono, non sanno o non debbono esercitare il compito di supporto all’autonomia, per evitare di distogliere personale scolastico dalle “aule” e/o dagli uffici della dirigenza,perché non ipotizzare una legge che preveda un ruolo autonomo con accesso attraverso un corso-concorso pubblico al quale, chiunque ne abbia i requisiti, possa partecipare?
Spero fortemente, Sigg.ri On.li Ministri, in una risposta qualunque per l’ASASi che ha a cuore only the good of the school.
Regards.
Joseph Luca,
0 comments:
Post a Comment